British Columbia Ministry of Energy and Mines, Geological Survey
BCAge 2004A-1:
a database of isotopic
age determinations for rock units from British
Columbia
release 3.0,
October 2004 (Open File
2004-3)
compiled
by: K. Breitsprecher and J.K. Mortensen
Pacific Centre for Isotopic and Geochemical Research,
Earth & Ocean Sciences, University of British Columbia
e-mail: kbreitsp@eos.ubc.ca,
jmortensen@eos.ubc.ca
Recommended Citation:
Breitsprecher, K. and Mortensen, J.K., 2004. BCAge
2004A - a database of isotopic age determinations for rock units from British
Columbia. British Columbia Ministry of Energy and Mines,
Geological Survey, Open File 2004-3 (Release 2.0), 7766 records, 9.3
Mb
The
original source is to be cited when quoting dates. The database (this
compilation) should be cited when referring to assemblages of data produced by
querying it.
Overview
BCAge
2004 is an MS-Access based database containing all reported non-proprietary
isotopic age determinations for bedrock units from British Columbia. It contains 7759 age
determinations from 4828 rock samples, summarizing 622 published articles,
theses or unpublished reports. The data is fully relational, and may be queried
by the user on the basis absolute age
(in Ma), location (NTS mapsheet, terrane polygon, or
decimal lat-long, as specified by the user) or source (e.g. author,
journal title, etc.). The product is not stand-alone; the end user must install
Microsoft Access, version 2000 or XP (2002). XP users must up-convert the
product – see information link on main menu for instructions.
What’s new for Release 3 (October 2004A-1):
2004A-1 (Release 3, October 2004) is a
corrective-release, not an update;
no new data has been added subsequent to the
July 2004 release (see below). Corrections were made to some sample locations,
and to a linkage issue between about 2 dozen rocks and their respective ages.
Also, a small number of records were removed, where such were identified to be
the result of redundant reporting. The above-noted revisions were identified
during the course of integrating the BCAge dataset to the national (GSC
Geochronology Knowledgebase) meta-data format. Approximately 100 records are
affected by this update; the vast majority of those affected were corrected with
respect to sample location.
New for Release 2 (July 2004A):
BCAge 2004A (July release) contains “new”
data, as reported and/or GeoRef-indexed after
the previous release, to May 2004; the previous release (February 2004)
contained reports indexed to June 2003. Corrections to sample or location
information have been made as required, based on reported or otherwise noted
errors, and/or as additional information has been made available to the
compilers. Ages and reliability ratings to pre-existing data may be
modified and/or upgraded, as work on them progresses from
“preliminary” to “final” findings, and or reaches
higher levels of publication.
A new TERRANE field has
been added. This field can be accessed under the “search by
location” menu, or can be applied as a secondary filter (right-click drop
down) on the “byAge” query screen. Please
note that this is a first-pass assignment of samples to terranes;
this information was generated by GIS overlay of data points onto BCGSB MapPlace terrane polygons. It is
intended at this time as a means of
extracting data by location within irregularly-shaped but geologically
meaningful regional boundaries, whereas the previous version was restricted
to searching by locations constrained to less-meaningful rectangular grids.
Because the terrane
information was generated by a GIS system, it is prone to errors resulting from
mismatches stemming from data coordinates, and in the level of detail resolved
by the GIS terrane layer. Further, the stratigraphic aspects of stacked terranes
is completely ignored by such a method. The field should
not be taken to reflect any
worker’s assessment of the correct terrane for
the rock.
Data
content
The data-base consists of 3 linked tables: 1) a rock table, which
contains one record for each sample dated; 2) an age table, containing one
record for each age determination reported; and 3) a sources table, containing
one record for each report containing ages. The relational nature of the
database ensures that multiple age determinations from a single sample (e.g.
either as replicate analysis, as ages determined using different isotopic
systems, or as multiple, multi-sourced grains in a clastic
sedimentary rock), are linked to that single sample, and display as such to the
user. Furthermore, this structure allows for ages from a single sample which
appeared in different reports (e.g. Ar-Ar ages in one
publication and U-Pb ages in another) to appear
simultaneously to the user, because they are linked to a single record in the
“rock” table.
Each
entry includes the following information
1. Internal database reference number(s);
2. Age and error (in Ma); interpretation (meaning) of
age;
3. Material dated, isotopic system used, and
laboratory in which the sample was dated;
5. The rock type and geological unit (where this is
known);
6. Reliability rating and comments;
7. Reference(s); and
8. Sample
location (NTS map area, latitude/longitude, UTM zone/easting/northing).
Data compiled in BCAge remains the ownership
of the authors who produced or reported that information. All ages returned by BCAge queries are linked to a complete listing of the
original source of the data and should be cited to that original report. Users
who wish to cite the results of a query, however, such as “Previously
reported ages for Unit X range from 85 to 115 Ma”, may cite this
compilation as the source of that information.
Accuracy of the data returned by BCAge should
be verified by the user from the original source(s). BCAge
is intended as a search engine to locate reports containing original isotopic
age data; the level of funding for the project did not allow for
double-checking of data after input. Further, in many cases, accuracy is
limited by the quality of the original reports. Of particular note is
significant errors in sample locations in some original reports, which have
been noted during the process of data entry. Problems encountered during
compilation include locations drawn on sketch maps with erroneous coordinates,
UTM coordinates reported one digit short of a proper coordinate, and loosely
constrained sample locations (the latter is particularly true for older
reports, which commonly constrain locations only to the nearest 5, or even 15,
minutes). Where noticed and/or possible, such errors in original reporting have
been corrected during compilation. As GIS-based mapping is becoming the new
norm, even a small amount of rounding in the reported coordinates can place a
sample in the wrong polygon for its lithologic type.
Sample locations in BCAge have NOT been rigorously checked for consistency with GIS or other map
product, except for those samples on mapsheets 82L & 82K. Also, note that many reports do not provide a detailed description of
the sample nor its geologic association. In such cases these fields are blank
or contain only the cursory information which was available in the report. The
user should not rely on all fields to contain information for all records.
Finally, the ‘geologic unit’ is limited also by both the level of
original reporting and by the
knowledge and nomenclature of the day at the time the report was issued. At
this time, the ‘geologic unit’ field has not been reassessed or
assigned to modern criteria or mapping.
Quality
of age determination
A number of issues with reliability and consistency of
reporting for K-Ar age determinations have been
addressed from the earliest BCAge release. Older K-Ar age determinations have been recalibrated as necessary
to current IUGS decay constants (Steiger and Jaeger,
1977). Such records contain a comment in the "Age Note" field
to this effect. All error levels have been adjusted from the original
report to reflect the 2 sigma level (95% confidence interval). All K/Ar ages have been assigned a cooling age interpretation,
although many in older reports have been originally interpreted as igneous
crystallization ages. Many of the K/Ar determinations
may well reflect igneous cooling, yet we now know that Ar-reset
by thermal events is a large-scale phenomenon in the Cordillera, and thus for
consistency, BCAge simply flags all such older (K/Ar) ages as “cooling age”. Assessment of
whether that cooling is due to thermal reset (eg. metamorphism)
or igneous cooling must be made by the individual worker using the ages.
Each age has been assigned
a "reliability
rating" so that
users can assess the degree to which they wish to rely on the age for their
study. There are 3 levels of rating:
-
"A" rating
– use with confidence, the age is apparently analytically sound.
-
"B" rating
– use with caution, some aspect of the reporting (interpretation, analytical data,
methodology) suggests the age should be regarded as an estimate (see chart below for specific
examples). Author cites age determination as ‘estimate’,
‘problematic’ or otherwise questions quality of the data/material
analyzed.
-
"C" rating
– do not use, the age is unreliable. This
is applied if the author cites the age as meaningless (geologically or
analytically), if the workers have used methods now known to be wholly
unreliable, or if the age determination
has been superceded by redating of the same rock by
more modern methods.
Excluded data: “Model” ages are not included in this compilation due to their derivation from
assumed values (model-dependence) rather than from analytical results alone. Rb-Sr ages based on a single, relatively non-radiogenic
analysis and an assumed initial Sr isotopic ratio are
herein considered to be model ages.

Reliability Rating criteria
|
RELIABILITY CODE
|
DESCRIPTION
|
|
A
|
apparently
analytically reliable
|
|
B
|
Analytical
reliability questionable, as noted by authors in original report, or by compilers
following guidelines below:
|
|
K-Ar
|
Biotite ages with low measured K2O contents (<5%), reflecting
either impure concentrates and/or alteration of the biotite.
In such cases the age should be considered a minimum age at best.
No correction was made
for the presence of atmospheric Argon. This includes many of the
analyses carried out at the GSC laboratory prior to about 1965. Although less
important for mica and relatively high-K whole-rock samples, this introduces
considerable error into ages for low-K samples such as amphiboles.
Age was determined from
whole-rock sample, a method now known to yield inaccurate results.
|
|
Rb-Sr
|
ages
calculated using 2-point Rb/Sr isochrons,
for which possible geological error cannot be evaluated (this does not
apply to Rb-Sr ages for whole rock-mica pairs).
Rb/Sr "errorchron"
ages, for which the calculated MSWD > 2.5, indicating scatter in the data
considerably outside of expected analytical error. The MSWD is given
for such ages (in some cases recalculated from the original analytical data,
where available). "Errorchrons"
usually indicate that the samples analysed are either not closely related, or
at least some of the samples have experienced post-crystallization isotopic
disturbance(s). These ages should be used with considerable caution.
|
|
Ar-Ar
|
Age is
not a plateau age. Note that definitions of “plateau” vary
between labs; this compilation is limited to the definition as used by the
lab/author producing the report. No
attempt has been made to validate ages reported as “plateaus” to
analytical data, except where
spectra are visibly disturbed (significant Ar-loss,
excess Ar, or recoil is suspected beyond that
reported). If such disturbed ages are
called “plateau” but are based on <50% Ar-release
and/or non-contiguous steps, a B rating is assigned.
|
|
U-Pb
|
Ages are
inferred from scattered discordant U-Pb zircon
analyses which do not define a discordia line.
Igneous age based on
single fraction
Detrital grains with 207Pb/206Pb age in
excess of 5%, but not more than 15%, discordant. For Mesozoic and younger
grains, the 207Pb/235U age is used to measure discordance rather than
207Pb/206Pb age.
|
|
C
|
Geological
error, scientific error, or methodological (details given in the comments
section)
Methodology
now known to be wholly inaccurate. Examples:
 |
some very early U/Pb dates are upper or
lower intercepts of discordia which includes
fractions from widely (100’s km) separated samples
|
 |
Rb-Sr ages which are derived from suites now known to be wholly
unrelated by other dating methods.
|
 |
Rb-Sr ages from suites of rocks with 100’s km
distribution
|
 |
Rb-Sr ages derived from materials, such as feldspars, in which Rb or Sr mobility is now well
documented
|
 |
K-Ar ages for which the material dated is
reportedly “heavily chloritized biotite”
|
Detrital grains with Pb/Pb age in excess
of 5%, but not more than 15%, discordant. For Mesozoic and younger grains,
the 207Pb/235U age is used to measure discordance rather than 207Pb/206Pb
age.
|

Usage
Notes
System The database was compiled on, and is
known to be compatible with, the following configuration:
Software: Microsoft Access, version 2000 or Office XP (=Access 2002). XP users
must perform a one-time data-base conversion. See convert.htm file on the CD
for instructions.
Op
System: Windows 2000 or XP
Querying the
database The database menu includes some search options which accommodate the most
common types of geological data querying: select records by age, by location,
or by source (reference). A working
knowledge of MS-Access will be helpful to the user who wishes to query at a
higher level, such as combining age and location. Some tips are provided under “selecting
records for export” below.
Two data retrieval
options are presented on the main menu.
Quick-hit opens a form to
view either the rock or reference data table; ages associated with each age or
report appear in a drop-down at the bottom of the ‘rock’ form, or
can be seen by clicking “view associated ages” on the
‘reference’ form. This method permits the user to browse the entire
dataset without querying a subset. The user can either